The Radeon RX 460 is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti, however, it's a better value for money, as it's €411.90 cheaper!
Advantages of the Radeon RX 460
- Up to 82% cheaper – €89.00 vs €500.90
- A better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 38% less energy – 75 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 200% more VRAM memory – 6 vs 2 GB
Radeon RX 460 vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
Feb 22nd, 2019
Average FPS
83
100%
Min 1% FPS
44
100%
Price, €
€500.9
17%
Value, €/FPS
€6.03/FPS
29%
Buy on Amazon
€500.90
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€349.99
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€540.97
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€228.74
In Stock
Radeon RX 460 vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon RX 460 vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon RX 460 vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon RX 460
Aug 8th, 2016
Memory
2 GB
33%
Memory Bandwidth
112 GB/s
39%
Pixel Fillrate
19.2 GPixel/s
23%
Texture Fillrate
67.2 GTexel/s
40%
FP32
2.15 TFLOPS
40%
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
Feb 22nd, 2019
Memory
6 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
288 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
84.96 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
169.9 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
5.437 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon RX 460 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Aug 8th, 2016 | Release Date | Feb 22nd, 2019 |
Not Available | MSRP | $279.00 |
Arctic Islands | Generation | GeForce 16 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
75 W | Power Consumption | 120 W |
Memory | ||
2 GB | Memory Size | 6 GB |
GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
128-bit | Memory Bus | 192-bit |
112 GB/s | Bandwidth | 288 GB/s |
Theoretical Performance | ||
19.2 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 84.96 GPixel/s |
67.2 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 169.9 GTexel/s |
2.15 TFLOPS | FP32 | 5.437 TFLOPS |