The Radeon RX 460 is a clear winner – it's a much faster gaming GPU than the Radeon RX 550 and it's also a better value for money, as it's €20.99 cheaper!
Advantages of the Radeon RX 460
- A much faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 19% cheaper – €89.00 vs €109.99
- A better value for money for gaming
Advantages of the Radeon RX 550
- Consumes up to 33% less energy – 50 vs 75 Watts
Radeon RX 460 vs Radeon RX 550 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon RX 550
Apr 20th, 2017
Average FPS
47
92%
Min 1% FPS
20
91%
Price, €
€109.99
80%
Value, €/FPS
€2.34/FPS
74%
Buy on Amazon
€109.99
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€99.99
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€99.98
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€219.50
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€96.99
In Stock
Radeon RX 460 vs Radeon RX 550 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon RX 460 vs Radeon RX 550 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon RX 460 vs Radeon RX 550 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon RX 460
Aug 8th, 2016
Memory
2 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
112 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
19.2 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
67.2 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
2.15 TFLOPS
100%
Radeon RX 550
Apr 20th, 2017
Memory
2 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
112 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
18.93 GPixel/s
99%
Texture Fillrate
37.86 GTexel/s
56%
FP32
1.211 TFLOPS
56%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon RX 460 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon RX 550 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Aug 8th, 2016 | Release Date | Apr 20th, 2017 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $79.00 |
| Arctic Islands | Generation | Polaris |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 75 W | Power Consumption | 50 W |
| Memory | ||
| 2 GB | Memory Size | 2 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| 128-bit | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
| 112 GB/s | Bandwidth | 112 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
19.2 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 18.93 GPixel/s |
67.2 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 37.86 GTexel/s |
2.15 TFLOPS | FP32 | 1.211 TFLOPS |
