The Radeon R9 M395X is a slightly faster gaming GPU than the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon R9 M395X
- A slightly faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 4 GB
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
The Radeon R9 M395X is better in every way
Radeon R9 M395X vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon R9 M395X
May 5th, 2015
Average FPS
57
100%
Min 1% FPS
26
100%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
Oct 25th, 2016
Average FPS
55
96%
Min 1% FPS
25
96%
Price, €
€447.05
100%
Value, €/FPS
€8.12/FPS
100%
Radeon R9 M395X vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R9 M395X vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R9 M395X vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R9 M395X
May 5th, 2015
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
160 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
23.14 GPixel/s
52%
Texture Fillrate
92.54 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
2.961 TFLOPS
100%
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
Oct 25th, 2016
Memory
4 GB
50%
Memory Bandwidth
112.1 GB/s
70%
Pixel Fillrate
44.54 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
66.82 GTexel/s
72%
FP32
2.138 TFLOPS
72%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R9 M395X | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| May 5th, 2015 | Release Date | Oct 25th, 2016 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $139.00 |
| Gem System | Generation | GeForce 10 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| 75 W | Power Consumption | 75 W |
| Memory | ||
8 GB | Memory Size | 4 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| 256-bit | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
160 GB/s | Bandwidth | 112.1 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 23.14 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 44.54 GPixel/s |
92.54 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 66.82 GTexel/s |
2.961 TFLOPS | FP32 | 2.138 TFLOPS |
