The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is the comparison's loser – it's at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Radeon PRO W7500 and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's only €26.50 cheaper!
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
- Up to 6% cheaper – €447.05 vs €473.55
Advantages of the Radeon PRO W7500
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 7% less energy – 70 vs 75 Watts
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 4 GB
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs Radeon PRO W7500 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
Oct 25th, 2016
Average FPS
55
65%
Min 1% FPS
25
56%
Price, €
€447.05
100%
Value, €/FPS
€8.12/FPS
69%
Radeon PRO W7500
Aug 3rd, 2023
Average FPS
84
100%
Min 1% FPS
45
100%
Price, €
€473.55
94%
Value, €/FPS
€5.63/FPS
100%
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs Radeon PRO W7500 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs Radeon PRO W7500 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs Radeon PRO W7500 in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
Oct 25th, 2016
Memory
4 GB
50%
Memory Bandwidth
112.1 GB/s
65%
Pixel Fillrate
44.54 GPixel/s
41%
Texture Fillrate
66.82 GTexel/s
35%
FP32
2.138 TFLOPS
18%
Radeon PRO W7500
Aug 3rd, 2023
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
172 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
108.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
190.4 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
12.19 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon PRO W7500 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 25th, 2016 | Release Date | Aug 3rd, 2023 |
$139.00 | MSRP | $429.00 |
| GeForce 10 | Generation | Radeon Pro Navi |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 75 W | Power Consumption | 70 W |
| Memory | ||
| 4 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 128-bit | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
| 112.1 GB/s | Bandwidth | 172 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 44.54 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 108.8 GPixel/s |
| 66.82 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 190.4 GTexel/s |
| 2.138 TFLOPS | FP32 | 12.19 TFLOPS |
