The Radeon R9 295X2 is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Arc B580. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon R9 295X2
The Arc B580 is better in every way
Advantages of the Arc B580
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 62% less energy – 190 vs 500 Watts
- Up to 200% more VRAM memory – 12 vs 4 GB
Radeon R9 295X2 vs Arc B580 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon R9 295X2
Apr 29th, 2014
Average FPS
67
50%
Min 1% FPS
33
41%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Arc B580
Jan 16th, 2025
Average FPS
135
100%
Min 1% FPS
80
100%
Price, €
€377.62
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.79/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
€377.62
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€340.00
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€363.12
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€379.99
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€409.00
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€399.99
In Stock
Radeon R9 295X2 vs Arc B580 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R9 295X2 vs Arc B580 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R9 295X2 vs Arc B580 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R9 295X2
Apr 29th, 2014
Memory
4 GB
33%
Memory Bandwidth
320 GB/s
70%
Pixel Fillrate
65.15 GPixel/s
31%
Texture Fillrate
179.2 GTexel/s
42%
FP32
5.733 TFLOPS
42%
Arc B580
Jan 16th, 2025
Memory
12 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
456 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
213.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
427.2 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
13.67 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R9 295X2 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Arc B580 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 29th, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 16th, 2025 |
| $1,499.00 | MSRP | $249.00 |
| Volcanic Islands | Generation | Battlemage |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 500 W | Power Consumption | 190 W |
| Memory | ||
| 4 GB | Memory Size | 12 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 512-bit | Memory Bus | 192-bit |
| 320 GB/s | Bandwidth | 456 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 65.15 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 213.6 GPixel/s |
| 179.2 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 427.2 GTexel/s |
| 5.733 TFLOPS | FP32 | 13.67 TFLOPS |
