The Radeon R9 270 is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Radeon RX 5700 XT. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon R9 270
- Consumes up to 33% less energy – 150 vs 225 Watts
Advantages of the Radeon RX 5700 XT
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 2 GB
Radeon R9 270 vs Radeon RX 5700 XT for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon R9 270
Nov 13th, 2013
Average FPS
50
48%
Min 1% FPS
22
38%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon RX 5700 XT
Jul 7th, 2019
Average FPS
104
100%
Min 1% FPS
58
100%
Price, €
€458
100%
Value, €/FPS
€4.4/FPS
100%
Radeon R9 270 vs Radeon RX 5700 XT in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R9 270 vs Radeon RX 5700 XT in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R9 270 vs Radeon RX 5700 XT in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R9 270
Nov 13th, 2013
Memory
2 GB
25%
Memory Bandwidth
179.2 GB/s
40%
Pixel Fillrate
29.6 GPixel/s
24%
Texture Fillrate
74 GTexel/s
24%
FP32
2.368 TFLOPS
24%
Radeon RX 5700 XT
Jul 7th, 2019
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
448 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
121.9 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
304.8 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
9.754 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R9 270 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon RX 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Nov 13th, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
$179.00 | MSRP | $399.00 |
| Volcanic Islands | Generation | Navi |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
150 W | Power Consumption | 225 W |
| Memory | ||
| 2 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 256-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
| 179.2 GB/s | Bandwidth | 448 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 29.6 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 121.9 GPixel/s |
| 74 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 304.8 GTexel/s |
| 2.368 TFLOPS | FP32 | 9.754 TFLOPS |
