The Radeon R9 270 is a much slower gaming GPU than the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon R9 270
The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is better in every way
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
- A much faster GPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 50% less energy – 75 vs 150 Watts
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory – 4 vs 2 GB
Radeon R9 270 vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon R9 270
Nov 13th, 2013
Average FPS
50
91%
Min 1% FPS
22
88%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
Oct 25th, 2016
Average FPS
55
100%
Min 1% FPS
25
100%
Price, €
€447.05
100%
Value, €/FPS
€8.12/FPS
100%
Radeon R9 270 vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R9 270 vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R9 270 vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R9 270
Nov 13th, 2013
Memory
2 GB
50%
Memory Bandwidth
179.2 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
29.6 GPixel/s
66%
Texture Fillrate
74 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
2.368 TFLOPS
100%
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
Oct 25th, 2016
Memory
4 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
112.1 GB/s
63%
Pixel Fillrate
44.54 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
66.82 GTexel/s
90%
FP32
2.138 TFLOPS
90%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R9 270 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Nov 13th, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 25th, 2016 |
$179.00 | MSRP | $139.00 |
Volcanic Islands | Generation | GeForce 10 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
150 W | Power Consumption | 75 W |
Memory | ||
2 GB | Memory Size | 4 GB |
GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
256-bit | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
179.2 GB/s | Bandwidth | 112.1 GB/s |
Theoretical Performance | ||
29.6 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 44.54 GPixel/s |
74 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 66.82 GTexel/s |
2.368 TFLOPS | FP32 | 2.138 TFLOPS |