Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER outperforms Radeon R5 240 OEM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both GPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER is 2188 days newer than Radeon R5 240 OEM.
Advantages of Radeon R5 240 OEM
- Consumes up to 60% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER - 50 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
- Performs up to 75% better in Deathloop than Radeon R5 240 OEM - 77 vs 44 FPS
- Up to 200% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM - 6 vs 2 GB
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 29th, 2019
FPS
77
100%
Value, €/FPS
€7.39/FPS
100%
Price, €
€569.39
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €569.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 117 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 1st, 2013
Desktop • Oct 29th, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Nov 1st, 2013
Pixel Fillrate
6.24 GPixel/s
7%
Texel Fillrate
18.72 GTexel/s
12%
Desktop • Oct 29th, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
85.68 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
157.1 GTexel/s
100%
Radeon R5 240 OEM | vs | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER |
---|---|---|
Nov 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 29th, 2019 |
Volcanic Islands | Generation | GeForce 16 |
Not Available | MSRP | $229 |
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 GB | Memory | 6 GB |
DDR3 | Type | GDDR6 |
64-bit | Bus | 192-bit |
14.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 336 GB/s |
730 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1530 MHz |
780 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1785 MHz |
900 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1750 MHz |