Key Differences
In short — GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB outperforms Radeon R5 240 OEM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both GPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB is 3485 days newer than Radeon R5 240 OEM.
Advantages of Radeon R5 240 OEM
- Consumes up to 70% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB - 50 vs 165 Watts
Advantages of GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB
- Performs up to 980% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Radeon R5 240 OEM - 108 vs 10 FPS
- Up to 700% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM - 16 vs 2 GB
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • May 18th, 2023
FPS
108
100%
Value, €/FPS
€5.02/FPS
100%
Price, €
€542
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €542 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7366 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Nov 1st, 2013
Desktop • May 18th, 2023
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Nov 1st, 2013
Pixel Fillrate
6.24 GPixel/s
5%
Texel Fillrate
18.72 GTexel/s
5%
Desktop • May 18th, 2023
Pixel Fillrate
121.7 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
344.8 GTexel/s
100%
Radeon R5 240 OEM | vs | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB |
---|---|---|
Nov 1st, 2013 | Release Date | May 18th, 2023 |
Volcanic Islands | Generation | GeForce 40 |
Not Available | MSRP | $499 |
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | Outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 16-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 GB | Memory | 16 GB |
DDR3 | Type | GDDR6 |
64-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
14.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 288 GB/s |
730 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 2310 MHz |
780 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 2535 MHz |
900 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2250 MHz |