Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1650 outperforms Radeon R5 240 OEM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both GPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1650 is 1999 days newer than Radeon R5 240 OEM.
Advantages of Radeon R5 240 OEM
- Consumes up to 33% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 - 50 vs 75 Watts
Advantages of GeForce GTX 1650
- Performs up to 56% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Radeon R5 240 OEM - 42 vs 27 FPS
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM - 4 vs 2 GB
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
42
100%
Value, €/FPS
€9.83/FPS
100%
Price, €
€412.66
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €412.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 1st, 2013
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Nov 1st, 2013
Pixel Fillrate
6.24 GPixel/s
12%
Texel Fillrate
18.72 GTexel/s
20%
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
100%
Radeon R5 240 OEM | vs | GeForce GTX 1650 |
---|---|---|
Nov 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Volcanic Islands | Generation | GeForce 16 |
Not Available | MSRP | $149 |
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
DDR3 | Type | GDDR5 |
64-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
14.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 128.1 GB/s |
730 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1485 MHz |
780 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1665 MHz |
900 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2001 MHz |