The Radeon Pro WX 9100 is the comparison's loser – it's a much slower gaming GPU than the GeForce GTX 1080 Ti and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's €591.95 more expensive!
Advantages of the Radeon Pro WX 9100
- Consumes up to 8% less energy – 230 vs 250 Watts
- Up to 45% more VRAM memory – 16 vs 11 GB
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 33% cheaper – €1198.00 vs €1789.95
- A much better value for money for gaming
Radeon Pro WX 9100 vs GeForce GTX 1080 Ti for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon Pro WX 9100
Jul 10th, 2017
Average FPS
84
79%
Min 1% FPS
45
75%
Price, €
€1789.95
66%
Value, €/FPS
€21.3/FPS
53%
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
Mar 10th, 2017
Average FPS
107
100%
Min 1% FPS
60
100%
Price, €
€1198
100%
Value, €/FPS
€11.19/FPS
100%
Radeon Pro WX 9100 vs GeForce GTX 1080 Ti in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon Pro WX 9100 vs GeForce GTX 1080 Ti in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon Pro WX 9100 vs GeForce GTX 1080 Ti in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon Pro WX 9100
Jul 10th, 2017
Memory
16 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
483.8 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
96 GPixel/s
69%
Texture Fillrate
384 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
12.29 TFLOPS
100%
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
Mar 10th, 2017
Memory
11 GB
69%
Memory Bandwidth
484.4 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
139.2 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
354.4 GTexel/s
92%
FP32
11.34 TFLOPS
92%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon Pro WX 9100 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce GTX 1080 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jul 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Mar 10th, 2017 |
| $1,599.00 | MSRP | $699.00 |
| Radeon Pro Polaris | Generation | GeForce 10 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
230 W | Power Consumption | 250 W |
| Memory | ||
16 GB | Memory Size | 11 GB |
| HBM2 | Memory Type | GDDR5X |
| 2048-bit | Memory Bus | 352-bit |
| 483.8 GB/s | Bandwidth | 484.4 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 96 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 139.2 GPixel/s |
384 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 354.4 GTexel/s |
12.29 TFLOPS | FP32 | 11.34 TFLOPS |
