The Radeon Pro WX 9100 is a slightly faster gaming GPU than the GeForce GTX 980 Ti, however, it's a much worse value for money, as it's €791.95 more expensive!
Advantages of the Radeon Pro WX 9100
- A slightly faster GPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 8% less energy – 230 vs 250 Watts
- Up to 167% more VRAM memory – 16 vs 6 GB
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 980 Ti
- Up to 44% cheaper – €998.00 vs €1789.95
- A better value for money for gaming
Radeon Pro WX 9100 vs GeForce GTX 980 Ti for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon Pro WX 9100
Jul 10th, 2017
Average FPS
84
100%
Min 1% FPS
45
100%
Price, €
€1789.95
55%
Value, €/FPS
€21.3/FPS
59%
GeForce GTX 980 Ti
Jun 2nd, 2015
Average FPS
80
95%
Min 1% FPS
42
93%
Price, €
€998
100%
Value, €/FPS
€12.47/FPS
100%
Radeon Pro WX 9100 vs GeForce GTX 980 Ti in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon Pro WX 9100 vs GeForce GTX 980 Ti in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon Pro WX 9100 vs GeForce GTX 980 Ti in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon Pro WX 9100
Jul 10th, 2017
Memory
16 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
483.8 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
96 GPixel/s
93%
Texture Fillrate
384 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
12.29 TFLOPS
100%
GeForce GTX 980 Ti
Jun 2nd, 2015
Memory
6 GB
38%
Memory Bandwidth
336.6 GB/s
70%
Pixel Fillrate
103.3 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
189.4 GTexel/s
49%
FP32
6.06 TFLOPS
49%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon Pro WX 9100 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce GTX 980 Ti |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Jul 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2015 |
$1,599.00 | MSRP | $649.00 |
Radeon Pro Polaris | Generation | GeForce 900 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
230 W | Power Consumption | 250 W |
Memory | ||
16 GB | Memory Size | 6 GB |
HBM2 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
2048-bit | Memory Bus | 384-bit |
483.8 GB/s | Bandwidth | 336.6 GB/s |
Theoretical Performance | ||
96 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 103.3 GPixel/s |
384 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 189.4 GTexel/s |
12.29 TFLOPS | FP32 | 6.06 TFLOPS |