The Radeon Pro WX 9100 is the comparison's loser – it's a much slower gaming GPU than the Arc A750 and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's €1714.00 more expensive!
Advantages of the Radeon Pro WX 9100
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory – 16 vs 8 GB
Advantages of the Arc A750
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 86% cheaper – €284.00 vs €1998.00
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 2% less energy – 225 vs 230 Watts
Radeon Pro WX 9100 vs Arc A750 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon Pro WX 9100
Jul 10th, 2017
Average FPS
84
69%
Min 1% FPS
45
63%
Price, €
€1998
14%
Value, €/FPS
€23.78/FPS
10%
Buy on Amazon
€284.00
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€338.69
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€253.50
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€281.13
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€271.00
In Stock
Radeon Pro WX 9100 vs Arc A750 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon Pro WX 9100 vs Arc A750 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon Pro WX 9100 vs Arc A750 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon Pro WX 9100
Jul 10th, 2017
Memory
16 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
483.8 GB/s
94%
Pixel Fillrate
96 GPixel/s
36%
Texture Fillrate
384 GTexel/s
71%
FP32
12.29 TFLOPS
71%
Arc A750
Oct 12th, 2022
Memory
8 GB
50%
Memory Bandwidth
512 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
268.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
537.6 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
17.2 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon Pro WX 9100 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Arc A750 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Jul 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2022 |
$1,599.00 | MSRP | $289.00 |
Radeon Pro Polaris | Generation | Alchemist |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
230 W | Power Consumption | 225 W |
Memory | ||
16 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
HBM2 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
2048-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
483.8 GB/s | Bandwidth | 512 GB/s |
Theoretical Performance | ||
96 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 268.8 GPixel/s |
384 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 537.6 GTexel/s |
12.29 TFLOPS | FP32 | 17.2 TFLOPS |