The Radeon Pro WX 3100 is the comparison's loser – it's a much slower gaming GPU than the Radeon RX 460 and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's €390.95 more expensive!
Advantages of the Radeon Pro WX 3100
- Consumes up to 13% less energy – 65 vs 75 Watts
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory – 4 vs 2 GB
Advantages of the Radeon RX 460
- A much faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 81% cheaper – €89.00 vs €479.95
- A much better value for money for gaming
Radeon Pro WX 3100 vs Radeon RX 460 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon Pro WX 3100
Jun 12th, 2017
Average FPS
47
92%
Min 1% FPS
20
91%
Price, €
€479.95
18%
Value, €/FPS
€10.21/FPS
17%
Radeon Pro WX 3100 vs Radeon RX 460 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon Pro WX 3100 vs Radeon RX 460 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon Pro WX 3100 vs Radeon RX 460 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon Pro WX 3100
Jun 12th, 2017
Memory
4 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
96 GB/s
86%
Pixel Fillrate
19.5 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
39.01 GTexel/s
58%
FP32
1.248 TFLOPS
58%
Radeon RX 460
Aug 8th, 2016
Memory
2 GB
50%
Memory Bandwidth
112 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
19.2 GPixel/s
98%
Texture Fillrate
67.2 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
2.15 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon Pro WX 3100 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon RX 460 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jun 12th, 2017 | Release Date | Aug 8th, 2016 |
| $199.00 | MSRP | Not Available |
| Radeon Pro Polaris | Generation | Arctic Islands |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
65 W | Power Consumption | 75 W |
| Memory | ||
4 GB | Memory Size | 2 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| 128-bit | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
| 96 GB/s | Bandwidth | 112 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
19.5 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 19.2 GPixel/s |
| 39.01 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 67.2 GTexel/s |
| 1.248 TFLOPS | FP32 | 2.15 TFLOPS |
