Key Differences
In short — GeForce RTX 3050 outperforms Radeon Pro 460 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both GPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce RTX 3050 is 1892 days newer than Radeon Pro 460.
Advantages of Radeon Pro 460
- Consumes up to 73% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 - 35 vs 130 Watts
Advantages of GeForce RTX 3050
- Performs up to 66% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Radeon Pro 460 - 68 vs 41 FPS
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon Pro 460 - 8 vs 4 GB
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
68
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.91/FPS
100%
Price, €
€197.9
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €197.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 259 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Mobile • Oct 30th, 2016
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Theoretical Performance
Mobile • Oct 30th, 2016
Pixel Fillrate
14.51 GPixel/s
26%
Texel Fillrate
58.05 GTexel/s
41%
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Pixel Fillrate
56.86 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
142.2 GTexel/s
100%
Radeon Pro 460 | vs | GeForce RTX 3050 |
---|---|---|
Oct 30th, 2016 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Radeon Pro Mac | Generation | GeForce 30 |
Not Available | MSRP | $249 |
None | Outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 8 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR6 |
128-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
81.28 GB/s | Bandwidth | 224 GB/s |
850 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1552 MHz |
907 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1777 MHz |
1270 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1750 MHz |