Key Differences
In short — GeForce RTX 3050 outperforms the cheaper Arc A310 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce RTX 3050 is 281 days older than the cheaper Arc A310.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050
- Performs up to 31% better in Battlefield V than Arc A310 - 136 vs 104 FPS
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than Intel Arc A310 - 8 vs 4 GB
Advantages of Intel Arc A310
- Up to 52% cheaper than GeForce RTX 3050 - €105.65 vs €222.34
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 - 30 vs 130 Watts
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €222.34 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74117 minutes ago
Buy for €105.65 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74116 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2022
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Pixel Fillrate
56.86 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
142.2 GTexel/s
100%
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2022
Pixel Fillrate
28 GPixel/s
49.24375659514597%
Texel Fillrate
56 GTexel/s
39.381153305203945%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 | vs | Intel Arc A310 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2022 |
GeForce 30 | Generation | Alchemist |
$249 | MSRP | Not Available |
1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | Outputs | 4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0 |
1x 8-pin | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | GDDR6 |
128-bit | Bus | 64-bit |
224 GB/s | Bandwidth | 124 GB/s |
1552 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1750 MHz |
1777 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1750 MHz |
1750 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1937 MHz |