Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Arc A750 outperforms the cheaper GeForce RTX 3050 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Arc A750 is 281 days newer than the cheaper GeForce RTX 3050.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050
- Up to 21% cheaper than Arc A750 - €205.0 vs €259.0
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than Intel Arc A750 - 130 vs 225 Watts
Advantages of Intel Arc A750
- Performs up to 35% better in Dead Space than GeForce RTX 3050 - 84 vs 62 FPS
- Up to 7% better value when playing Dead Space than GeForce RTX 3050 - €3.08 vs €3.31 per FPS
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €205 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11557 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2022
FPS
84
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.08/FPS
100%
Price, €
€259
79%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €259 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11556 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2022
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Pixel Fillrate
56.86 GPixel/s
21%
Texel Fillrate
142.2 GTexel/s
26%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 | vs | Intel Arc A750 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2022 |
GeForce 30 | Generation | Alchemist |
$249 | MSRP | $289 |
1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | Outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0 |
1x 8-pin | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 GB | Memory | 8 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | GDDR6 |
128-bit | Bus | 256-bit |
224 GB/s | Bandwidth | 512 GB/s |
1552 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 2050 MHz |
1777 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 2400 MHz |
1750 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2000 MHz |