Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 280X outperforms GeForce MX450 25W on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 280X is 2503 days older than GeForce MX450 25W.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce MX450 25W
- Consumes up to 90% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 280X - 25 vs 250 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 280X
- Performs up to 7% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than GeForce MX450 25W - 29 vs 27 FPS
- Up to 50% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce MX450 25W - 3 vs 2 GB
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
GeForce MX450 25W
Mobile • Aug 15th, 2020
Radeon R9 280X
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
Theoretical Performance
GeForce MX450 25W
Mobile • Aug 15th, 2020
Pixel Fillrate
29.76 GPixel/s
93%
Texel Fillrate
52.08 GTexel/s
40%
NVIDIA GeForce MX450 25W | vs | AMD Radeon R9 280X |
|---|---|---|
Aug 15th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 8th, 2013 |
| GeForce MX | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $299 |
| None | Outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 GB | Memory | 3 GB |
| GDDR6 | Type | GDDR5 |
| 64-bit | Bus | 384-bit |
| 80 GB/s | Bandwidth | 288 GB/s |
| 720 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 850 MHz |
| 930 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1000 MHz |
| 1250 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |
