Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 280 outperforms GeForce MX450 25W on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 280 is 2356 days older than GeForce MX450 25W.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce MX450 25W
- Consumes up to 88% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 280 - 25 vs 200 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 280
- Performs up to 6% better in Borderlands 3 than GeForce MX450 25W - 56 vs 53 FPS
- Up to 50% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce MX450 25W - 3 vs 2 GB
Borderlands 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
GeForce MX450 25W
Mobile • Aug 15th, 2020
Radeon R9 280
Desktop • Mar 4th, 2014
Theoretical Performance
GeForce MX450 25W
Mobile • Aug 15th, 2020
Pixel Fillrate
29.76 GPixel/s
99%
Texel Fillrate
52.08 GTexel/s
49%
Radeon R9 280
Desktop • Mar 4th, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
29.86 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
104.5 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce MX450 25W | vs | AMD Radeon R9 280 |
|---|---|---|
Aug 15th, 2020 | Release Date | Mar 4th, 2014 |
| GeForce MX | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $279 |
| None | Outputs | 1x DVI, 2x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 GB | Memory | 3 GB |
| GDDR6 | Type | GDDR5 |
| 64-bit | Bus | 384-bit |
| 80 GB/s | Bandwidth | 240 GB/s |
| 720 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 827 MHz |
| 930 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 933 MHz |
| 1250 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1250 MHz |
