Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 960 outperforms GeForce GTX 680M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 960 is 962 days newer than GeForce GTX 680M.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 - 100 vs 120 Watts
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 - 4 vs 2 GB
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960
- Performs up to 100% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than GeForce GTX 680M - 2 vs 1 FPS
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
GeForce GTX 680M
Mobile • Jun 4th, 2012
GeForce GTX 960
Desktop • Jan 22nd, 2015
Theoretical Performance
GeForce GTX 680M
Mobile • Jun 4th, 2012
Pixel Fillrate
21.22 GPixel/s
56%
Texel Fillrate
84.9 GTexel/s
100%
GeForce GTX 960
Desktop • Jan 22nd, 2015
Pixel Fillrate
37.7 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
75.39 GTexel/s
88%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M | vs | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 4th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 22nd, 2015 |
| GeForce 600M | Generation | GeForce 900 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $199 |
| None | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 2 GB |
| GDDR5 | Type | GDDR5 |
| 256-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
115.2 GB/s | Bandwidth | 112.2 GB/s |
| 719 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1127 MHz |
| 758 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1178 MHz |
| 900 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1753 MHz |
