Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 Nano outperforms GeForce GTX 465 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 Nano is 1914 days newer than GeForce GTX 465.
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 Nano
- Performs up to 10% better in War Thunder than GeForce GTX 465 - 227 vs 207 FPS
- Consumes up to 12% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465 - 175 vs 200 Watts
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465 - 4 vs 1 GB
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
GeForce GTX 465
Desktop • May 31st, 2010
Radeon R9 Nano
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2015
Theoretical Performance
GeForce GTX 465
Desktop • May 31st, 2010
Pixel Fillrate
13.38 GPixel/s
20%
Texel Fillrate
26.75 GTexel/s
10%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465 | vs | AMD Radeon R9 Nano |
|---|---|---|
| May 31st, 2010 | Release Date | Aug 27th, 2015 |
| GeForce 400 | Generation | Pirate Islands |
$279 | MSRP | $649 |
| 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | Outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| 2x 6-pin | Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 1 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
| GDDR5 | Type | HBM |
| 256-bit | Bus | 4096-bit |
| 102.7 GB/s | Bandwidth | 512 GB/s |
| 608 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1000 MHz |
| Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
802 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 500 MHz |
