Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 295X2 outperforms GeForce GTX 465 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 295X2 is 1429 days newer than GeForce GTX 465.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465
- Consumes up to 60% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 295X2 - 200 vs 500 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 295X2
- Performs up to 73% better in Apex Legends than GeForce GTX 465 - 104 vs 60 FPS
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465 - 4 vs 1 GB
Apex Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • May 31st, 2010
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2014
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • May 31st, 2010
Pixel Fillrate
13.38 GPixel/s
20%
Texel Fillrate
26.75 GTexel/s
14%
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
65.15 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
179.2 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465 | vs | AMD Radeon R9 295X2 |
---|---|---|
May 31st, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2014 |
GeForce 400 | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
$279 | MSRP | $1499 |
2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | Outputs | 1x DVI, 4x mini-DisplayPort |
2x 6-pin | Power Connectors | 3x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
1 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR5 |
256-bit | Bus | 512-bit |
102.7 GB/s | Bandwidth | 320 GB/s |
608 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1018 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
802 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1250 MHz |