Key Differences
In short — Radeon Pro WX 2100 outperforms GeForce GTX 460M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon Pro WX 2100 is 2466 days newer than GeForce GTX 460M.
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100
- Performs up to 1% better in F1 23 than GeForce GTX 460M - 164 vs 162 FPS
- Consumes up to 30% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460M - 35 vs 50 Watts
- Up to 33% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460M - 2 vs 1.5 GB
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jun 4th, 2017
FPS
164
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.43/FPS
100%
Price, €
€398
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €398 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 0 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Mobile • Sep 3rd, 2010
Desktop • Jun 4th, 2017
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Jun 4th, 2017
Pixel Fillrate
19.5 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
39.01 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460M | vs | AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2010 | Release Date | Jun 4th, 2017 |
GeForce 400M | Generation | Radeon Pro |
Not Available | MSRP | $149 |
None | Outputs | 1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
1.5 GB | Memory | 2 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR5 |
192-bit | Bus | 64-bit |
60 GB/s | Bandwidth | 48 GB/s |
675 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 925 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 1219 MHz |
625 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |