Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1650 outperforms the cheaper Radeon RX 460 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Radeon RX 460 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing GeForce GTX 1650 is 988 days newer than the cheaper Radeon RX 460.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
- Performs up to 25% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Radeon RX 460 - 64 vs 51 FPS
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon RX 460 - 4 vs 2 GB
Advantages of AMD Radeon RX 460
- Up to 58% cheaper than GeForce GTX 1650 - €79.0 vs €190.28
- Up to 48% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than GeForce GTX 1650 - €1.55 vs €2.97 per FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
64
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.97/FPS
52.18855218855219%
Price, €
€190.28
41%
FPS Winner
Buy for €190.28 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 60979 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 8th, 2016
FPS
51
79.6875%
Value, €/FPS
€1.55/FPS
100%
Price, €
€79
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 60980 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Aug 8th, 2016
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
100%
Desktop • Aug 8th, 2016
Pixel Fillrate
19.2 GPixel/s
36.03603603603604%
Texel Fillrate
67.2 GTexel/s
72.07207207207207%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 | vs | AMD Radeon RX 460 |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Aug 8th, 2016 |
GeForce 16 | Generation | Arctic Islands |
$149 | MSRP | Not Available |
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 2 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR5 |
128-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
128.1 GB/s | Bandwidth | 112 GB/s |
1485 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1090 MHz |
1665 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1200 MHz |
2001 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1750 MHz |