Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile outperforms Radeon R7 250E on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is 2316 days newer than Radeon R7 250E.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
- Performs up to 49% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Radeon R7 250E - 52 vs 35 FPS
- Consumes up to 9% less energy than AMD Radeon R7 250E - 50 vs 55 Watts
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R7 250E - 4 vs 1 GB
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Mobile • Apr 23rd, 2020
Desktop • Dec 20th, 2013
Theoretical Performance
Mobile • Apr 23rd, 2020
Pixel Fillrate
47.52 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
95.04 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile | vs | AMD Radeon R7 250E |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2020 | Release Date | Dec 20th, 2013 |
GeForce 16 Mobile | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
Not Available | MSRP | $109 |
None | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 1 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | GDDR5 |
128-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
192 GB/s | Bandwidth | 72 GB/s |
1350 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 800 MHz |
1485 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
1500 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1125 MHz |