Key Differences
In short — Radeon R5 230 outperforms GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R5 230 is 2212 days older than GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R5 230 - 4 vs 1 GB
Advantages of AMD Radeon R5 230
- Performs up to 17% better in Far Cry 3 than GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile - 172 vs 147 FPS
- Consumes up to 62% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile - 19 vs 50 Watts
Far Cry 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2014
FPS
172
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.32/FPS
100%
Price, €
€55.64
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €55.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 198 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Apr 23rd, 2020
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2014
Theoretical Performance
Mobile • Apr 23rd, 2020
Pixel Fillrate
47.52 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
95.04 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile | vs | AMD Radeon R5 230 |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2014 |
GeForce 16 Mobile | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
None | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 1 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | DDR3 |
128-bit | Bus | 64-bit |
192 GB/s | Bandwidth | 10.67 GB/s |
1350 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 625 MHz |
1485 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
1500 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 667 MHz |