Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile outperforms Radeon Pro WX 2100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is 1054 days newer than Radeon Pro WX 2100.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
- Performs up to 24% better in The Callisto Protocol than Radeon Pro WX 2100 - 67 vs 54 FPS
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 - 4 vs 2 GB
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100
- Consumes up to 30% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile - 35 vs 50 Watts
The Callisto Protocol
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 4th, 2017
FPS
54
80%
Value, €/FPS
€7.37/FPS
100%
Price, €
€398
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €398 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 47 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Apr 23rd, 2020
Desktop • Jun 4th, 2017
Theoretical Performance
Mobile • Apr 23rd, 2020
Pixel Fillrate
47.52 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
95.04 GTexel/s
100%
Desktop • Jun 4th, 2017
Pixel Fillrate
19.5 GPixel/s
41%
Texel Fillrate
39.01 GTexel/s
41%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile | vs | AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2020 | Release Date | Jun 4th, 2017 |
GeForce 16 Mobile | Generation | Radeon Pro |
Not Available | MSRP | $149 |
None | Outputs | 1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 2 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | GDDR5 |
128-bit | Bus | 64-bit |
192 GB/s | Bandwidth | 48 GB/s |
1350 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 925 MHz |
1485 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1219 MHz |
1500 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |