Key Differences
In short — Radeon PRO W7500 outperforms GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon PRO W7500 is 1218 days newer than GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
- Consumes up to 29% less energy than AMD Radeon PRO W7500 - 50 vs 70 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon PRO W7500
- Performs up to 35% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - 66 vs 49 FPS
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - 8 vs 4 GB
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Aug 3rd, 2023
FPS
66
100%
Value, €/FPS
€6.61/FPS
100%
Price, €
€436
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €436 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 191 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Mobile • Apr 2nd, 2020
Desktop • Aug 3rd, 2023
Theoretical Performance
Mobile • Apr 2nd, 2020
Pixel Fillrate
38.4 GPixel/s
35%
Texel Fillrate
76.8 GTexel/s
40%
Desktop • Aug 3rd, 2023
Pixel Fillrate
108.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
190.4 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q | vs | AMD Radeon PRO W7500 |
---|---|---|
Apr 2nd, 2020 | Release Date | Aug 3rd, 2023 |
GeForce 16 Mobile | Generation | Radeon Pro Navi |
Not Available | MSRP | $429 |
None | Outputs | 4x DisplayPort 2.1 |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 8 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | GDDR6 |
128-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
160 GB/s | Bandwidth | 172 GB/s |
1035 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |
1200 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1700 MHz |
1250 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1344 MHz |