Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1660 Ti outperforms the cheaper Radeon PRO W7500 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is 1623 days older than the cheaper Radeon PRO W7500.
Advantages of AMD Radeon PRO W7500
- Up to 12% cheaper than GeForce GTX 1660 Ti - €450.34 vs €510.37
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti - 70 vs 120 Watts
- Up to 33% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti - 8 vs 6 GB
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
- Performs up to 1% better in No Man's Sky than Radeon PRO W7500 - 111 vs 110 FPS
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €450.34 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74273 minutes ago
Buy for €510.37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74275 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 3rd, 2023
Desktop • Feb 22nd, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Aug 3rd, 2023
Pixel Fillrate
108.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
190.4 GTexel/s
100%
Desktop • Feb 22nd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
84.96 GPixel/s
78.08823529411765%
Texel Fillrate
169.9 GTexel/s
89.23319327731093%
AMD Radeon PRO W7500 | vs | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti |
---|---|---|
Aug 3rd, 2023 | Release Date | Feb 22nd, 2019 |
Radeon Pro Navi | Generation | GeForce 16 |
$429 | MSRP | $279 |
4x DisplayPort 2.1 | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 GB | Memory | 6 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | GDDR6 |
128-bit | Bus | 192-bit |
172 GB/s | Bandwidth | 288 GB/s |
1500 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |
1700 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1770 MHz |
1344 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |