Key Differences
In short — Arc A380 outperforms GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Arc A380 is 790 days newer than GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
- Consumes up to 33% less energy than Intel Arc A380 - 50 vs 75 Watts
Advantages of Intel Arc A380
- Performs up to 11% better in Battlefield 1 than GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile - 100 vs 90 FPS
- Up to 50% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile - 6 vs 4 GB
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 14th, 2022
FPS
100
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.41/FPS
100%
Price, €
€140.63
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €140.63 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 211 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Apr 15th, 2020
Desktop • Jun 14th, 2022
Theoretical Performance
Mobile • Apr 15th, 2020
Pixel Fillrate
48.48 GPixel/s
73%
Texel Fillrate
96.96 GTexel/s
73%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile | vs | Intel Arc A380 |
---|---|---|
Apr 15th, 2020 | Release Date | Jun 14th, 2022 |
GeForce 16 Mobile | Generation | Alchemist |
Not Available | MSRP | $149 |
None | Outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0 |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 6 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | GDDR6 |
128-bit | Bus | 96-bit |
192 GB/s | Bandwidth | 186 GB/s |
1380 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 2000 MHz |
1515 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 2050 MHz |
1500 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1937 MHz |