Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q outperforms Radeon Pro WX 2100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q is 1046 days newer than Radeon Pro WX 2100.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
- Performs up to 12% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Radeon Pro WX 2100 - 109 vs 97 FPS
- Consumes up to 14% less energy than AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 - 30 vs 35 Watts
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 - 4 vs 2 GB
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jun 4th, 2017
FPS
97
88%
Value, €/FPS
€4.1/FPS
100%
Price, €
€398
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €398 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 100 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Mobile • Apr 15th, 2020
Desktop • Jun 4th, 2017
Theoretical Performance
Mobile • Apr 15th, 2020
Pixel Fillrate
36 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
72 GTexel/s
100%
Desktop • Jun 4th, 2017
Pixel Fillrate
19.5 GPixel/s
54%
Texel Fillrate
39.01 GTexel/s
54%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q | vs | AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 |
---|---|---|
Apr 15th, 2020 | Release Date | Jun 4th, 2017 |
GeForce 16 Mobile | Generation | Radeon Pro |
Not Available | MSRP | $149 |
None | Outputs | 1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 2 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | GDDR5 |
128-bit | Bus | 64-bit |
160 GB/s | Bandwidth | 48 GB/s |
930 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 925 MHz |
1125 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1219 MHz |
1250 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |