Buy on Amazon
€116.6
In Stock
Same as Founder's Edition
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $199
Availability
MSRP in USD: $199
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $99
Availability
MSRP in USD: $99
Key Differences
In short — Radeon RX 560 outperforms GeForce GTS 250 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon RX 560 is 2967 days newer than GeForce GTS 250.
Advantages of AMD Radeon RX 560
- Performs up to 2% better in F1 23 than GeForce GTS 250 - 167 vs 164 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 - 75 vs 150 Watts
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 - 4 vs 1 GB
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Radeon RX 560
Desktop • Apr 18th, 2017
FPS
167
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.7/FPS
100%
Price, €
€116.6
100%
FPS and Value Winner
ASUS Dual Radeon RX 560 4GB Grafikkarte (AMD Radeon RX560, PCIe 3.0, 4GB GDDR5 Speicher, HDMI 2.0b, 2x DisplayPort 1.4, DUAL-RX560-4G)
Buy for €116.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15732 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
GeForce GTS 250
Desktop • Mar 4th, 2009
Radeon RX 560
Desktop • Apr 18th, 2017
Theoretical Performance
Radeon RX 560
Desktop • Apr 18th, 2017
Pixel Fillrate
20.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
81.6 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 | vs | AMD Radeon RX 560 |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 4th, 2009 | Release Date | Apr 18th, 2017 |
| GeForce 200 | Generation | Polaris |
$199 | MSRP | $99 |
| 2x DVI | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| 1x 6-pin | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 1 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
| GDDR3 | Type | GDDR5 |
| 256-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
| 64.51 GB/s | Bandwidth | 112 GB/s |
| 675 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1175 MHz |
| Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 1275 MHz |
| 1008 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1750 MHz |
Similar GPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar graphics card comparisons. Most compared graphics card combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
