Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTS 250 outperforms Radeon R7 240 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTS 250 is 1679 days older than Radeon R7 240.
Advantages of AMD Radeon R7 240
- Consumes up to 80% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 - 30 vs 150 Watts
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 - 2 vs 1 GB
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
FPS
1
100%
Value, €/FPS
€94.99/FPS
100%
Price, €
€94.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €94.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 123 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Mar 4th, 2009
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Mar 4th, 2009
Pixel Fillrate
10.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
43.2 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 | vs | AMD Radeon R7 240 |
---|---|---|
Mar 4th, 2009 | Release Date | Oct 8th, 2013 |
GeForce 200 | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
$199 | MSRP | $69 |
2x DVI | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
1x 6-pin | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
1 GB | Memory | 2 GB |
GDDR3 | Type | GDDR5 |
256-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
64.51 GB/s | Bandwidth | 73.6 GB/s |
675 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 650 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 700 MHz |
1008 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1150 MHz |