Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTS 250 outperforms Radeon Pro WX 2100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTS 250 is 3014 days older than Radeon Pro WX 2100.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250
- Performs up to 2% better in Borderlands 3 than Radeon Pro WX 2100 - 49 vs 48 FPS
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 - 35 vs 150 Watts
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 - 2 vs 1 GB
Borderlands 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
Desktop • Jun 4th, 2017
FPS
48
97%
Value, €/FPS
€8.29/FPS
100%
Price, €
€398
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €398 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 52 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
Desktop • Mar 4th, 2009
Desktop • Jun 4th, 2017
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Mar 4th, 2009
Pixel Fillrate
10.8 GPixel/s
55%
Texel Fillrate
43.2 GTexel/s
100%
Desktop • Jun 4th, 2017
Pixel Fillrate
19.5 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
39.01 GTexel/s
90%
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 | vs | AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 |
---|---|---|
Mar 4th, 2009 | Release Date | Jun 4th, 2017 |
GeForce 200 | Generation | Radeon Pro |
$199 | MSRP | $149 |
2x DVI | Outputs | 1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
1x 6-pin | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
1 GB | Memory | 2 GB |
GDDR3 | Type | GDDR5 |
256-bit | Bus | 64-bit |
64.51 GB/s | Bandwidth | 48 GB/s |
675 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 925 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 1219 MHz |
1008 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |