Key Differences
In short — Radeon PRO W7600 outperforms GeForce GT 220 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon PRO W7600 is 4937 days newer than GeForce GT 220.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GT 220
- Consumes up to 55% less energy than AMD Radeon PRO W7600 - 58 vs 130 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon PRO W7600
- Performs up to 94% better in DOOM Eternal than GeForce GT 220 - 246 vs 127 FPS
- Up to 700% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 - 8 vs 1 GB
DOOM Eternal
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Desktop • Aug 3rd, 2023
FPS
246
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.48/FPS
100%
Price, €
€609.54
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €609.54 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 35457 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Desktop • Jan 26th, 2010
Desktop • Aug 3rd, 2023
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Jan 26th, 2010
Pixel Fillrate
4.8 GPixel/s
3.0729833546734957%
Texel Fillrate
14.4 GTexel/s
4.610951008645533%
Desktop • Aug 3rd, 2023
Pixel Fillrate
156.2 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
312.3 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 | vs | AMD Radeon PRO W7600 |
---|---|---|
Jan 26th, 2010 | Release Date | Aug 3rd, 2023 |
GeForce 200 | Generation | Radeon Pro Navi |
Not Available | MSRP | $599 |
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | Outputs | 4x DisplayPort 2.1 |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
1 GB | Memory | 8 GB |
GDDR3 | Type | GDDR6 |
128-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
22.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 288 GB/s |
600 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1720 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 2440 MHz |
700 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2250 MHz |