Key Differences
In short — Radeon PRO W7600 outperforms the cheaper GeForce GT 220 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing GeForce GT 220 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Radeon PRO W7600 is 4937 days newer than the cheaper GeForce GT 220.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GT 220
- Up to 92% cheaper than Radeon PRO W7600 - €49.0 vs €638.13
- Up to 74% better value when playing Alan Wake 2 than Radeon PRO W7600 - €2.88 vs €11.0 per FPS
- Consumes up to 55% less energy than AMD Radeon PRO W7600 - 58 vs 130 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon PRO W7600
- Performs up to 241% better in Alan Wake 2 than GeForce GT 220 - 58 vs 17 FPS
- Up to 700% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 - 8 vs 1 GB
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for €49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 136 minutes ago
Buy for €638.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 134 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 26th, 2010
Desktop • Aug 3rd, 2023
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Aug 3rd, 2023
Pixel Fillrate
156.2 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
312.3 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 | vs | AMD Radeon PRO W7600 |
---|---|---|
Jan 26th, 2010 | Release Date | Aug 3rd, 2023 |
GeForce 200 | Generation | Radeon Pro Navi |
Not Available | MSRP | $599 |
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | Outputs | 4x DisplayPort 2.1 |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
1 GB | Memory | 8 GB |
GDDR3 | Type | GDDR6 |
128-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
22.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 288 GB/s |
600 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1720 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 2440 MHz |
700 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2250 MHz |