Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Radeon RX 6900 XT outperforms the more expensive Radeon PRO W7600 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Radeon RX 6900 XT is 1009 days older than the more expensive Radeon PRO W7600.
Advantages of AMD Radeon PRO W7600
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT - 130 vs 300 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT
- Performs up to 124% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Radeon PRO W7600 - 94 vs 42 FPS
- Up to 2% cheaper than Radeon PRO W7600 - €625.0 vs €640.77
- Up to 56% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Radeon PRO W7600 - €6.65 vs €15.26 per FPS
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon PRO W7600 - 16 vs 8 GB
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Buy for €640.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 28th, 2020
FPS
94
100%
Value, €/FPS
€6.65/FPS
100%
Price, €
€625
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €625 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Aug 3rd, 2023
Desktop • Oct 28th, 2020
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Aug 3rd, 2023
Pixel Fillrate
156.2 GPixel/s
54%
Texel Fillrate
312.3 GTexel/s
43%
Desktop • Oct 28th, 2020
Pixel Fillrate
288 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
720 GTexel/s
100%
AMD Radeon PRO W7600 | vs | AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT |
---|---|---|
Aug 3rd, 2023 | Release Date | Oct 28th, 2020 |
Radeon Pro Navi | Generation | Navi II |
$599 | MSRP | $999 |
4x DisplayPort 2.1 | Outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1, 2x DisplayPort 1.4a, 1x USB Type-C |
1x 6-pin | Power Connectors | 2x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 GB | Memory | 16 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | GDDR6 |
128-bit | Bus | 256-bit |
288 GB/s | Bandwidth | 512 GB/s |
1720 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1825 MHz |
2440 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 2250 MHz |
2250 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2000 MHz |