Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 280X outperforms Iris Graphics 6100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 280X is 332 days older than Iris Graphics 6100.
Advantages of Intel Iris Graphics 6100
- Consumes up to 94% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 280X - 15 vs 250 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 280X
- Performs up to 320% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than Iris Graphics 6100 - 21 vs 5 FPS
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Iris Graphics 6100
Integrated • Sep 5th, 2014
Radeon R9 280X
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
Theoretical Performance
Iris Graphics 6100
Integrated • Sep 5th, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
6 GPixel/s
18%
Texel Fillrate
48 GTexel/s
37%
Intel Iris Graphics 6100 | vs | AMD Radeon R9 280X |
|---|---|---|
Sep 5th, 2014 | Release Date | Oct 8th, 2013 |
| HD Graphics-M | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $299 |
| Portable Device Dependent | Outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
| System-Shared | Memory | 3 GB |
| System-Shared | Type | GDDR5 |
| System-Shared | Bus | 384-bit |
| System-Shared | Bandwidth | 288 GB/s |
| 300 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 850 MHz |
| 1000 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1000 MHz |
| System-Shared | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |
