Key Differences
In short — Radeon R7 265 outperforms Iris Graphics 6100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R7 265 is 204 days older than Iris Graphics 6100.
Advantages of Intel Iris Graphics 6100
- Consumes up to 90% less energy than AMD Radeon R7 265 - 15 vs 150 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R7 265
- Performs up to 0% better in League of Legends than Iris Graphics 6100 - 366 vs 365 FPS
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Integrated • Sep 5th, 2014
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2014
Theoretical Performance
Integrated • Sep 5th, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
6 GPixel/s
20%
Texel Fillrate
48 GTexel/s
81%
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
29.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
59.2 GTexel/s
100%
Intel Iris Graphics 6100 | vs | AMD Radeon R7 265 |
---|---|---|
Sep 5th, 2014 | Release Date | Feb 13th, 2014 |
HD Graphics-M | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
Not Available | MSRP | $149 |
Portable Device Dependent | Outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
System-Shared | Memory | 2 GB |
System-Shared | Type | GDDR5 |
System-Shared | Bus | 256-bit |
System-Shared | Bandwidth | 179.2 GB/s |
300 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 900 MHz |
1000 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 925 MHz |
System-Shared | Memory Clock Speed | 1400 MHz |