Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 280X outperforms HD Graphics 500 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 280X is 693 days older than HD Graphics 500.
Advantages of Intel HD Graphics 500
- Consumes up to 98% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 280X - 6 vs 250 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 280X
- Performs up to 47% better in Monster Hunter: World than HD Graphics 500 - 63 vs 43 FPS
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Integrated • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
Theoretical Performance
Intel HD Graphics 500 | vs | AMD Radeon R9 280X |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Oct 8th, 2013 |
HD Graphics-T | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
Not Available | MSRP | $299 |
Portable Device Dependent | Outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
System-Shared | Memory | 3 GB |
System-Shared | Type | GDDR5 |
System-Shared | Bus | 384-bit |
System-Shared | Bandwidth | 288 GB/s |
200 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 850 MHz |
650 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1000 MHz |
System-Shared | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |