Key Differences
In short — Radeon R7 265 outperforms HD Graphics 500 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R7 265 is 565 days older than HD Graphics 500.
Advantages of Intel HD Graphics 500
- Consumes up to 96% less energy than AMD Radeon R7 265 - 6 vs 150 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R7 265
- Performs up to 30% better in Starfield than HD Graphics 500 - 13 vs 10 FPS
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
HD Graphics 500
Integrated • Sep 1st, 2015
Radeon R7 265
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2014
Theoretical Performance
Radeon R7 265
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
29.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
59.2 GTexel/s
100%
Intel HD Graphics 500 | vs | AMD Radeon R7 265 |
|---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Feb 13th, 2014 |
| HD Graphics-T | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $149 |
| Portable Device Dependent | Outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
| System-Shared | Memory | 2 GB |
| System-Shared | Type | GDDR5 |
| System-Shared | Bus | 256-bit |
| System-Shared | Bandwidth | 179.2 GB/s |
| 200 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 900 MHz |
| 650 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 925 MHz |
| System-Shared | Memory Clock Speed | 1400 MHz |
