Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 750 Ti outperforms the cheaper Radeon Pro WX 3200 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Radeon Pro WX 3200 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing GeForce GTX 750 Ti is 1960 days older than the cheaper Radeon Pro WX 3200.
Advantages of GeForce GTX 750 Ti
- Consumes up to 8% less energy than AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 - 60 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Radeon Pro WX 3200
- Up to 11% cheaper than GeForce GTX 750 Ti - €149.09 vs €167.49
- Up to 11% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than GeForce GTX 750 Ti - €149.09 vs €167.49 per FPS
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti - 4 vs 2 GB
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Buy for €167.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 202 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2019
FPS
1
100%
Value, €/FPS
€149.09/FPS
100%
Price, €
€149.09
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €149.09 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 203 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Feb 18th, 2014
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Feb 18th, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
17.36 GPixel/s
84%
Texel Fillrate
43.4 GTexel/s
100%
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
20.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
41.44 GTexel/s
95%
GeForce GTX 750 Ti | vs | Radeon Pro WX 3200 |
---|---|---|
Feb 18th, 2014 | Release Date | Jul 2nd, 2019 |
GeForce 700 | Generation | Radeon Pro |
$149 | MSRP | $199 |
2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | Outputs | 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR5 |
128-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
86.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 96 GB/s |
1020 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1295 MHz |
1085 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
1350 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |