Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1050 Ti outperforms the cheaper Radeon Pro WX 3200 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Radeon Pro WX 3200 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is 980 days older than the cheaper Radeon Pro WX 3200.
Advantages of GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
- Performs up to 14% better in Battlefield 2042 than Radeon Pro WX 3200 - 58 vs 51 FPS
Advantages of Radeon Pro WX 3200
- Up to 67% cheaper than GeForce GTX 1050 Ti - €149.09 vs €447.05
- Up to 62% better value when playing Battlefield 2042 than GeForce GTX 1050 Ti - €2.92 vs €7.71 per FPS
- Consumes up to 13% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti - 65 vs 75 Watts
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
FPS
58
100%
Value, €/FPS
€7.71/FPS
38%
Price, €
€447.05
33%
FPS Winner
Buy for €447.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 372 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2019
FPS
51
88%
Value, €/FPS
€2.92/FPS
100%
Price, €
€149.09
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €149.09 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 373 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Pixel Fillrate
44.54 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
66.82 GTexel/s
100%
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
20.72 GPixel/s
47%
Texel Fillrate
41.44 GTexel/s
62%
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | vs | Radeon Pro WX 3200 |
---|---|---|
Oct 25th, 2016 | Release Date | Jul 2nd, 2019 |
GeForce 10 | Generation | Radeon Pro |
$139 | MSRP | $199 |
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | Outputs | 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR5 |
128-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
112.1 GB/s | Bandwidth | 96 GB/s |
1291 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1295 MHz |
1392 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
1752 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |