The GeForce 210 is the comparison's loser – it's at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the GeForce RTX 5090 and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's only €4143.01 cheaper!
Advantages of the GeForce 210
- Up to 99% cheaper – €45.99 vs €4189.00
- Consumes up to 95% less energy – 31 vs 575 Watts
Advantages of the GeForce RTX 5090
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- A better value for money for gaming
- Up to 6300% more VRAM memory – 32 vs 0 GB
GeForce 210 vs GeForce RTX 5090 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Buy on Amazon
€45.99
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€79.50
In Stock
GeForce RTX 5090
Jan 30th, 2025
Average FPS
242
100%
Min 1% FPS
166
100%
Price, €
€4189
1%
Value, €/FPS
€17.3/FPS
7%
Buy on Amazon
€4,189.00
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€4,029.00
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€4,090.00
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€4,099.00
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€4,899.00
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€6,499.99
In Stock
GeForce 210 vs GeForce RTX 5090 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce 210 vs GeForce RTX 5090 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce 210 vs GeForce RTX 5090 in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce 210
Oct 12th, 2009
Memory
0.5 GB
2%
Memory Bandwidth
6.4 GB/s
0%
Pixel Fillrate
2.08 GPixel/s
0%
Texture Fillrate
4.16 GTexel/s
0%
FP32
39.36 GFLOPS
0%
GeForce RTX 5090
Jan 30th, 2025
Memory
32 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
1790 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
423.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
1637 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
104.8 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce 210 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce RTX 5090 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Oct 12th, 2009 | Release Date | Jan 30th, 2025 |
Not Available | MSRP | $1,999.00 |
GeForce 200 | Generation | GeForce 50 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
31 W | Power Consumption | 575 W |
Memory | ||
0.5 GB | Memory Size | 32 GB |
DDR3 | Memory Type | GDDR7 |
64-bit | Memory Bus | 512-bit |
6.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 1790 GB/s |
Theoretical Performance | ||
2.08 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 423.6 GPixel/s |
4.16 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 1637 GTexel/s |
39.36 GFLOPS | FP32 | 104.8 TFLOPS |