The GeForce 210 is the comparison's loser – it's at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Radeon RX 6800 XT and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's only €1334.85 cheaper!
Advantages of the GeForce 210
- Up to 97% cheaper – €45.99 vs €1380.84
- Consumes up to 90% less energy – 31 vs 300 Watts
Advantages of the Radeon RX 6800 XT
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Up to 3100% more VRAM memory – 16 vs 0 GB
GeForce 210 vs Radeon RX 6800 XT for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Buy on Amazon
€45.99
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€79.50
In Stock
Radeon RX 6800 XT
Oct 28th, 2020
Average FPS
159
100%
Min 1% FPS
97
100%
Price, €
€1380.84
3%
Value, €/FPS
€8.68/FPS
13%
Buy on Amazon
€1,380.84
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€712.56
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€1,089.98
In Stock
GeForce 210 vs Radeon RX 6800 XT in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce 210 vs Radeon RX 6800 XT in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce 210 vs Radeon RX 6800 XT in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce 210
Oct 12th, 2009
Memory
0.5 GB
3%
Memory Bandwidth
6.4 GB/s
1%
Pixel Fillrate
2.08 GPixel/s
1%
Texture Fillrate
4.16 GTexel/s
1%
FP32
39.36 GFLOPS
0%
Radeon RX 6800 XT
Oct 28th, 2020
Memory
16 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
512 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
288 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
648 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
20.74 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce 210 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon RX 6800 XT |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 12th, 2009 | Release Date | Oct 28th, 2020 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $649.00 |
| GeForce 200 | Generation | Navi II |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
31 W | Power Consumption | 300 W |
| Memory | ||
| 0.5 GB | Memory Size | 16 GB |
| DDR3 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 64-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
| 6.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 512 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 2.08 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 288 GPixel/s |
| 4.16 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 648 GTexel/s |
| 39.36 GFLOPS | FP32 | 20.74 TFLOPS |
