The Arc A370M is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Radeon RX 6650 XT. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Arc A370M
- Consumes up to 80% less energy – 35 vs 176 Watts
Advantages of the Radeon RX 6650 XT
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 4 GB
Arc A370M vs Radeon RX 6650 XT for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
All items are out of stock.
Radeon RX 6650 XT
May 10th, 2022
Average FPS
107
100%
Min 1% FPS
60
100%
Price, €
€264
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.46/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
€264.00
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€835.28
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€502.00
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€369.85
In Stock
Arc A370M vs Radeon RX 6650 XT in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Arc A370M vs Radeon RX 6650 XT in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Arc A370M vs Radeon RX 6650 XT in core GPU performance specifications
Arc A370M
Mar 30th, 2022
Memory
4 GB
50%
Memory Bandwidth
112 GB/s
40%
Pixel Fillrate
65.6 GPixel/s
39%
Texture Fillrate
131.2 GTexel/s
39%
FP32
4.198 TFLOPS
39%
Radeon RX 6650 XT
May 10th, 2022
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
280.3 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
168.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
337.3 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
10.79 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Arc A370M | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon RX 6650 XT |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 30th, 2022 | Release Date | May 10th, 2022 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $399.00 |
| Alchemist | Generation | Navi II |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
35 W | Power Consumption | 176 W |
| Memory | ||
| 4 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
| GDDR6 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 64-bit | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
| 112 GB/s | Bandwidth | 280.3 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 65.6 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 168.6 GPixel/s |
| 131.2 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 337.3 GTexel/s |
| 4.198 TFLOPS | FP32 | 10.79 TFLOPS |
