The Arc A370M is a much slower gaming GPU than the GeForce RTX 3050. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Arc A370M
- Consumes up to 73% less energy – 35 vs 130 Watts
Advantages of the GeForce RTX 3050
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 4 GB
Arc A370M vs GeForce RTX 3050 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
All items are out of stock.
GeForce RTX 3050
Jan 4th, 2022
Average FPS
83
100%
Min 1% FPS
44
100%
Price, €
€214.9
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.58/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
€214.90
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€191.90
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€208.00
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€189.90
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€208.00
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€232.77
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€196.90
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€202.94
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€223.90
In Stock
Arc A370M vs GeForce RTX 3050 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Arc A370M vs GeForce RTX 3050 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Arc A370M vs GeForce RTX 3050 in core GPU performance specifications
Arc A370M
Mar 30th, 2022
Memory
4 GB
50%
Memory Bandwidth
112 GB/s
50%
Pixel Fillrate
65.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
131.2 GTexel/s
92%
FP32
4.198 TFLOPS
46%
GeForce RTX 3050
Jan 4th, 2022
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
224 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
56.86 GPixel/s
87%
Texture Fillrate
142.2 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
9.098 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Arc A370M | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce RTX 3050 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Mar 30th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $249.00 |
| Alchemist | Generation | GeForce 30 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
35 W | Power Consumption | 130 W |
| Memory | ||
| 4 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
| GDDR6 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 64-bit | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
| 112 GB/s | Bandwidth | 224 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
65.6 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 56.86 GPixel/s |
| 131.2 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 142.2 GTexel/s |
| 4.198 TFLOPS | FP32 | 9.098 TFLOPS |
