The Arc A350M is at least 2x faster gaming GPU than the GeForce 210. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Arc A350M
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 19% less energy – 25 vs 31 Watts
- Up to 700% more VRAM memory – 4 vs 0 GB
Advantages of the GeForce 210
The Arc A350M is better in every way
Arc A350M vs GeForce 210 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Arc A350M
Mar 30th, 2022
Average FPS
58
100%
Min 1% FPS
27
100%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Buy on Amazon
€45.99
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€79.50
In Stock
Arc A350M vs GeForce 210 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Arc A350M vs GeForce 210 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Arc A350M vs GeForce 210 in core GPU performance specifications
Arc A350M
Mar 30th, 2022
Memory
4 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
112 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
52.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
105.6 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
3.379 TFLOPS
100%
GeForce 210
Oct 12th, 2009
Memory
0.5 GB
12%
Memory Bandwidth
6.4 GB/s
6%
Pixel Fillrate
2.08 GPixel/s
4%
Texture Fillrate
4.16 GTexel/s
4%
FP32
39.36 GFLOPS
1%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Arc A350M | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce 210 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Mar 30th, 2022 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2009 |
| Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
| Alchemist | Generation | GeForce 200 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
25 W | Power Consumption | 31 W |
| Memory | ||
4 GB | Memory Size | 0.5 GB |
| GDDR6 | Memory Type | DDR3 |
| 64-bit | Memory Bus | 64-bit |
112 GB/s | Bandwidth | 6.4 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
52.8 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 2.08 GPixel/s |
105.6 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 4.16 GTexel/s |
3.379 TFLOPS | FP32 | 39.36 GFLOPS |
