Key Differences
In short — GeForce RTX 3050 outperforms the cheaper GeForce 210 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing GeForce 210 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing GeForce RTX 3050 is 4467 days newer than the cheaper GeForce 210.
Advantages of GeForce 210
- Up to 79% cheaper than GeForce RTX 3050 - €45.99 vs €222.90
- Up to 77% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than GeForce RTX 3050 - €0.13 vs €0.57 per FPS
- Consumes up to 76% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 - 31 vs 130 Watts
Advantages of GeForce RTX 3050
- Performs up to 15% better in Counter-Strike 2 than GeForce 210 - 392 vs 341 FPS
- Up to 1500% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce 210 - 8 vs 0 GB
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2009
FPS
341
87%
Value, €/FPS
€0.13/FPS
100%
Price, €
€45.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €45.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1128 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
392
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.57/FPS
23%
Price, €
€222.9
20%
FPS Winner
Buy for €222.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1128 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2009
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Pixel Fillrate
56.86 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
142.2 GTexel/s
100%
GeForce 210 | vs | GeForce RTX 3050 |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2009 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
GeForce 200 | Generation | GeForce 30 |
Not Available | MSRP | $249 |
1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, 1x VGA | Outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
0.5 GB | Memory | 8 GB |
DDR3 | Type | GDDR6 |
64-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
6.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 224 GB/s |
520 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1552 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 1777 MHz |
400 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1750 MHz |