Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 290 outperforms Radeon Pro WX 2100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 290 is 1307 days older than Radeon Pro WX 2100.
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 290
- Performs up to 44% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Radeon Pro WX 2100 - 39 vs 27 FPS
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 - 4 vs 2 GB
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100
- Consumes up to 87% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 290 - 35 vs 275 Watts
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 4th, 2017
FPS
27
69%
Value, €/FPS
€14.74/FPS
100%
Price, €
€398
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €398 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 154 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2013
Desktop • Jun 4th, 2017
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2013
Pixel Fillrate
60.61 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
151.5 GTexel/s
100%
Desktop • Jun 4th, 2017
Pixel Fillrate
19.5 GPixel/s
32%
Texel Fillrate
39.01 GTexel/s
25%
AMD Radeon R9 290 | vs | AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 |
---|---|---|
Nov 5th, 2013 | Release Date | Jun 4th, 2017 |
Volcanic Islands | Generation | Radeon Pro |
$399 | MSRP | $149 |
2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | Outputs | 1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 2 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR5 |
512-bit | Bus | 64-bit |
320 GB/s | Bandwidth | 48 GB/s |
947 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 925 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 1219 MHz |
1250 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |