Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 780 outperforms Radeon R7 260X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 780 is 138 days older than Radeon R7 260X.
Advantages of AMD Radeon R7 260X
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 - 115 vs 250 Watts
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780
- Performs up to 400% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Radeon R7 260X - 5 vs 1 FPS
- Up to 50% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R7 260X - 3 vs 2 GB
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Buy for €998 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 200 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
Desktop • May 23rd, 2013
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
Pixel Fillrate
17.6 GPixel/s
40.646651270207855%
Texel Fillrate
61.6 GTexel/s
35.565819861431876%
Desktop • May 23rd, 2013
Pixel Fillrate
43.3 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
173.2 GTexel/s
100%
AMD Radeon R7 260X | vs | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 |
---|---|---|
Oct 8th, 2013 | Release Date | May 23rd, 2013 |
Volcanic Islands | Generation | GeForce 700 |
$139 | MSRP | $649 |
2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | Outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
1x 6-pin | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 GB | Memory | 3 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR5 |
128-bit | Bus | 384-bit |
104 GB/s | Bandwidth | 288.4 GB/s |
1100 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 863 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 902 MHz |
1625 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1502 MHz |